A Web Based Toolkit for Using Remote Sensing Data

By Chris Roelfsema, posted on June 20th, 2010 in Articles, Biodiversity, Climate, Disasters, Earth Observation, Ecosystems, Oceans, Technology, Water, Weather

  • Facebook
  • email
  • Twitter

Dr. Chris Roelfsema, Prof. Stuart Phinn, Dieter Tracey, Joh Speirs, Michael Hewson and Dr. Kasper Johansen

http://www.gpem.uq.edu.au/cser-rstoolkit

Biophysical Remote Sensing Group
Centre Spatial Environmental Science,
School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management
University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Contact email: c.roelfsema@uq.edu.au

Maps derived from airborne and satellite imaging systems provide reliable and cost effective information for monitoring, modelling and managing marine, terrestrial and atmospheric environments. As the number of commercial and free airborne and satellite image types increases, along with easier access to public domain and open-source image processing approaches, the choice of which data and processing approach(es) to use is confusing. To enable technicians, scientists and managers to make the most appropriate selection of data and a processing approach for a specific environment and application, an interactive, web-based toolkit was created by the Biophysical Remote Sensing Group at the University of Queensland.

The main aim of the remote sensing toolkit with a conceptualisation of the environments discussed.

The remote sensing toolkit shows managers, scientists and technicians working in marine, terrestrial and atmospheric environments how remote sensing images can be used to map and monitor environmental features.

The toolkit teaches managers, scientists and technicians working in marine, terrestrial and atmospheric environments, how images collected from satellites and aircraft (remote sensing) can be used to map and monitor environmental features or processes, and their change over time.

The toolkit guides users through the process of selecting remotely sensed data to map a specific biophysical variable in a terrestrial, marine or atmospheric environment, and then outlines the processing and resource requirements, and likely costs for implementing such a project. Detailed descriptions are provided for type(s) of image data required, along with the type of processing approach and requisite personnel, hardware and software. The toolkit also provides examples of different mapping applications, and brief explanations of how remote sensing technologies work, as well as references or resource material.

The toolkit is intended to reduce the gap in knowledge between remote sensing scientists/technicians as “the producers” and the wide range of groups using the remote sensing based products “the users.” Developing and improving this understanding is essential to enable remote sensing to be used effectively in terrestrial, marine or atmospheric environments. The toolkit can also be used to educate interested students, scientists, technicians or managers.

The toolkit is not creating a web-based GIS or image processing system to produce maps. Nor does it provide a single solution for specific mapping needs.

As environments, management issues, remote sensing data sources, image processing techniques, and the questions asked by scientist and managers keep changing, the toolkit will be updated. It is meant to function as a heuristic or self-learning and evolving tool, serving as a means for the Biophysical Remote Sensing Group to communicate, share and develop their accumulated knowledge and experience in solving practical problems.

Screenshot from remote sensing toolkit http://ww2.gpem.uq.edu.au/CRSSIS/tools/rstoolkit_new/html/marine/reefs/rf-geo_sh_tb-cl.html

Example screen shot of the marine toolkit where a user can asses what remote sensing option is suitable for mapping coral reef habitats at a specified water depth and/or water clarity rang.

The toolkit is based on the conceptual framework developed from past research by Prof. Stuart Phinn and Dr. Chris Roelfsema. With funding from the Cooperate Research Centre for Coastal Zone, Estuaries & Waterways Management and an Australian Research Council Discovery Grant, Prof. Phinn’s initial framework was translated into a Coastal Remote Sensing web-based toolkit in 2006. This initial toolkit was significantly revised and expanded in 2010 by Dr. Roelfsema and Prof. Phinn and with help of staff and students of the Biophysical Remote Sensing Group and with funding from the World Bank GEF Coral Reef Target Research Program(http://www.gefcoral.org/) and the University of Queensland. The 2010 toolkit covers atmospheric and terrestrial environments, in addition to an expanded marine section, and a section explaining how remote sensing image acquisition, field data acquisition and image processing works. Future work will update the parameters measured and range of sensors, and also develop an interactive learning package with focus on the use of remote sensing in marine, terrestrial and atmospheric environments.

Supporting references:

Roelfsema, C.M (2009) Integrating Field and Remotely Sensed Data for Assessment of Coral Reef and Seagrass Habitats, Doctoral Thesis, School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Management, The University of Queensland.

Phinn, S.R., Roelfsema, C.M. and Stumpf, R. (2010) “Remote sensing: Discerning the promise from the reality”. In: Longstaff, B.J., T.J.B. Carruthers, W.C. Dennison, T.R. Lookingbill, J.M. Hawkey, J.E. Thomas, E.C. Wicks, and J. Woerner (eds) Integrating and applying science: A handbook for effective coastal ecosystem assessment. IAN Press, Cambridge, Maryland. U.S.A., Chapter 15, pp.201-222.

Phinn, S., Stow, D., Franklin, J., Mertes, L. and Michaelsen, J. (2003) Remotely sensed data for ecosystem analyses: “Combining hierarchy theory and scene models”, Environmental Management, 31(3):429-441.

Phinn, S.R., Menges , C. , Hill, G.J.E. and Stanford, M. (2000) “Optimising remotely sensed solutions for monitoring, modelling and managing coastal environments,” Remote Sensing of Environment, 73(2):117-132.

Phinn, S.R. (1998) “A Framework for Selecting Appropriate Remotely Sensed Data Dimensions For Environmental Monitoring and Management”. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19(17): 3457-3463.

  • Facebook
  • email
  • Twitter

Earthzine Friends

NASA's Applied Science Program
EGIDA logo
EuroGEOSS
IEEE GRSS

NASA Daily Image

Remnant of a Supernova

Remnant of a Supernova

Vital clues about the devastating ends to the lives of massive stars can be found by studying the aftermath of their explosions. In its more than twelve years of science operations, NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory has studied many of these supernova remnants sprinkled across the galaxy. The latest example of this important investigation is Chandra's new image of the supernova remnant known as G350.1-0.3. This stellar debris field is located some 14,700 light years from the Earth toward the center of the Milky Way. Evidence from Chandra and from ESA's XMM-Newton telescope suggest that a compact object within G350.1+0.3 may be the dense core of the star that exploded. The position of this likely neutron star, seen by the arrow pointing to "neutron star" in the inset image, is well away from the center of the X-ray emission. If the supernova explosion occurred near the center of the X-ray emission then the neutron star must have received a powerful kick in the supernova explosion. Data suggest this supernova remnant, as it appears in the image, is 600 and 1,200 years old. If the estimated location of the explosion is correct, this means the neutron star has been moving at a speed of at least 3 million miles per hour since the explosion. Another intriguing aspect of G350.1-0.3 is its unusual shape. Many supernova remnants are nearly circular, but G350.1-0.3 is strikingly asymmetrical as seen in the Chandra data in this image (gold). Infrared data from NASA's Spitzer Space Telescope (light blue) also trace the morphology found by Chandra. Astronomers think that this bizarre shape is due to stellar debris field expanding into a nearby cloud of cold molecular gas. The age of 600-1,200 years puts the explosion that created G350.1-0.3 in the same time frame as other famous supernovas that formed the Crab and SN 1006 supernova remnants. However, it is unlikely that anyone on Earth would have seen the explosion because of the obscuring gas and dust that lies along our line of sight to the remnant. These results appeared in the April 10, 2011 issue of The Astrophysical Journal. Image Credits: X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO/I. Lovchinsky et al; IR: NASA/JPL-Caltech